Comments on: Community 2.0 http://libraryviews.blogsome.com/2006/05/16/330/ 一位圖書館工作者的閱讀與學習筆記 Fri, 11 Dec 2009 17:28:24 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha by: QQ123 http://libraryviews.blogsome.com/2006/05/16/330/#comment-1825 Fri, 16 Oct 2009 20:25:22 +0100 http://libraryviews.blogsome.com/2006/05/16/330/#comment-1825 如果翻譯內容能更好就好了@@ 翻成 社區2.0 挺怪的 社群2.0可能比較適當吧 畢竟是在講網際網路(互聯網)上的community 感謝分享 這是個對人有益處的部落格 如果翻譯內容能更好就好了@@

翻成 社區2.0 挺怪的

社群2.0可能比較適當吧

畢竟是在講網際網路(互聯網)上的community

感謝分享 這是個對人有益處的部落格

]]> by: charlesc http://libraryviews.blogsome.com/2006/05/16/330/#comment-358 Fri, 02 Jun 2006 09:59:32 +0100 http://libraryviews.blogsome.com/2006/05/16/330/#comment-358 嗯...好，謝謝ginger，來研究看看:) 嗯...好，謝謝ginger，來研究看看:)

]]> by: ginger http://libraryviews.blogsome.com/2006/05/16/330/#comment-350 Thu, 25 May 2006 20:06:47 +0100 http://libraryviews.blogsome.com/2006/05/16/330/#comment-350 ?贴不上了？不好意思了 ?贴不上了？不好意思了

]]> by: ginger http://libraryviews.blogsome.com/2006/05/16/330/#comment-347 Thu, 25 May 2006 15:38:43 +0100 http://libraryviews.blogsome.com/2006/05/16/330/#comment-347 关于social network和community，最近L2有<a href="http://library2.0.alablog.org/blog/_archives/2006/5/15/1958530.html" target="_blank">帖子</a>云：I use the term "learning network" rather than "learning community." I think this distinction is important because using the language of community creates expectations and desires that cannot be met by online networks. 多少能体味点不同 另MIT有课程：Community and Social Networks: Social Relations, Place and Cyberspace（http://web.mit.edu/knh/www/11530.html）有一丁点儿用吧 关于social network和community，最近L2有帖子云：I use the term “learning network” rather than “learning community.” I think this distinction is important because using the language of community creates expectations and desires that cannot be met by online networks.
多少能体味点不同
另MIT有课程：Community and Social Networks: Social Relations, Place and Cyberspace（http://web.mit.edu/knh/www/11530.html）有一丁点儿用吧

]]> by: charlesc http://libraryviews.blogsome.com/2006/05/16/330/#comment-345 Thu, 25 May 2006 10:02:02 +0100 http://libraryviews.blogsome.com/2006/05/16/330/#comment-345 感謝...不過看不出來XD 不知道有沒有人比較過social network與community的異同？ 感謝...不過看不出來XD

不知道有沒有人比較過social network與community的異同？

]]> by: ginger http://libraryviews.blogsome.com/2006/05/16/330/#comment-344 Wed, 24 May 2006 20:47:54 +0100 http://libraryviews.blogsome.com/2006/05/16/330/#comment-344 楼上举的段落图林中文译站是翻译了的，不过没有分段而已，呵呵 楼上举的段落图林中文译站是翻译了的，不过没有分段而已，呵呵

]]> by: ted http://libraryviews.blogsome.com/2006/05/16/330/#comment-337 Fri, 19 May 2006 06:56:37 +0100 http://libraryviews.blogsome.com/2006/05/16/330/#comment-337 作者是沒有直接比較 1.0 與 2.0 之間的差異。 其實在原文裏有幾段是图林中文译站沒有翻譯到的，如 Online community has evolved well beyond the message board and the listserv and is hastily becoming an integral part of our everyday lives. We are seeing a natural progression which began with the original static content delivery site. We moved onward to the interactive website which allowed communication between the site and the individual in a limited fashion through tools such as message boards. And we have arrived at the community site which fosters group interactivity. 多少可以看出community 1.0/2.0之間的差異，所以建議可以看一下原文。 作者是沒有直接比較 1.0 與 2.0 之間的差異。

其實在原文裏有幾段是图林中文译站沒有翻譯到的，如

Online community has evolved well beyond the message board and the listserv and is hastily becoming an integral part of our everyday lives. We are seeing a natural progression which began with the original static content delivery site. We moved onward to the interactive website which allowed communication between the site and the individual in a limited fashion through tools such as message boards. And we have arrived at the community site which fosters group interactivity.

多少可以看出community 1.0/2.0之間的差異，所以建議可以看一下原文。

]]> by: charlesc http://libraryviews.blogsome.com/2006/05/16/330/#comment-336 Thu, 18 May 2006 09:59:38 +0100 http://libraryviews.blogsome.com/2006/05/16/330/#comment-336 好像沒提到community 1.0/2.0之間的差異? 好像沒提到community 1.0/2.0之間的差異?

]]>